Contrasting Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ) and The Competition

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE: TRQ) is one of 105 publicly-traded companies in the “Integrated Mining” industry, but how does it weigh in compared to its rivals? We will compare Turquoise Hill Resources to related companies based on the strength of its valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Turquoise Hill Resources and its rivals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources 0 3 3 0 2.50
Turquoise Hill Resources Competitors 871 2844 3003 76 2.34

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.85%. As a group, “Integrated Mining” companies have a potential upside of 0.48%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources’ stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than its rivals.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

32.9% of Turquoise Hill Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of shares of all “Integrated Mining” companies are held by institutional investors. 12.1% of shares of all “Integrated Mining” companies are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and its rivals gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue EBITDA Price/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources $892.02 million $159.41 million 54.18
Turquoise Hill Resources Competitors $6.77 billion $2.77 billion -17.45

Turquoise Hill Resources’ rivals have higher revenue and earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a higher price-to-earnings ratio than its rivals, indicating that it is currently more expensive than other companies in its industry.

Risk and Volatility

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources’ rivals have a beta of 0.78, suggesting that their average stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and its rivals’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources 14.20% 1.60% 1.01%
Turquoise Hill Resources Competitors -42,378.23% -5.74% -4.80%

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats its rivals on 7 of the 13 factors compared.

About Turquoise Hill Resources

Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. is an international mining company. The Company focuses on the operation and further development of the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold mine in Southern Mongolia, which is the Company’s principal material mineral resource property. The Company’s Oyu Tolgoi mine is held through approximately 65% interest in Oyu Tolgoi LLC (Oyu Tolgoi) and the remaining approximately 35% interest is held by Erdenes Oyu Tolgoi LLC (Erdenes). The Company’s Oyu Tolgoi mine is located approximately 550 kilometers south of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia’s capital city, and 80 kilometers north of the Mongolia-China border. The Company’s Mineralization on the property consists of porphyry-style copper, gold, silver and molybdenum contained in a linear structural trend (the Oyu Tolgoi Trend) of deposits throughout this trend. They include, from south to north, the Heruga Deposit, the Oyut deposit and the Hugo Dummett deposits (Hugo South, Hugo North and Hugo North Extension).

Receive News & Ratings for Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Leave a Reply