Quantum Corporation (QTM) & Its Competitors Head to Head Comparison

Quantum Corporation (NYSE: QTM) is one of 22 public companies in the “Computer Hardware” industry, but how does it compare to its competitors? We will compare Quantum Corporation to similar businesses based on the strength of its valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

65.3% of Quantum Corporation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of shares of all “Computer Hardware” companies are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Quantum Corporation shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of shares of all “Computer Hardware” companies are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Quantum Corporation and its competitors top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue NetIncome Price/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Corporation $505.35 million $3.64 million -17.96
Quantum Corporation Competitors $31.37 billion $5.01 billion 428.59

Quantum Corporation’s competitors have higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Corporation. Quantum Corporation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than its competitors, indicating that it is currently more affordable than other companies in its industry.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Quantum Corporation and its competitors, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Corporation 0 0 1 0 3.00
Quantum Corporation Competitors 282 1417 2913 105 2.60

Quantum Corporation presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 122.72%. As a group, “Computer Hardware” companies have a potential upside of 5.90%. Given Quantum Corporation’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Quantum Corporation is more favorable than its competitors.

Risk and Volatility

Quantum Corporation has a beta of 2.18, suggesting that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quantum Corporation’s competitors have a beta of 1.03, suggesting that their average stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.


This table compares Quantum Corporation and its competitors’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Corporation -1.77% -7.26% -0.83%
Quantum Corporation Competitors 6.07% 8.15% 5.19%


Quantum Corporation competitors beat Quantum Corporation on 7 of the 12 factors compared.

About Quantum Corporation

Quantum Corporation focuses on scale-out storage, archive and data protection, providing solutions for capturing, sharing, managing and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle. The Company’s end-to-end tiered storage solutions enable users to maximize the value of their data by making it accessible whenever and wherever needed, retaining it indefinitely and reducing total cost and complexity. It works with a network of distributors, value-added resellers (VARs), direct marketing resellers (DMRs), original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and other suppliers to meet customers’ evolving needs. Its scale-out storage portfolio includes StorNext software, appliances and full systems called StorNext Pro Solutions, as well as Xcellis workflow storage, QXS disk storage, Lattus extended online storage and Q-Cloud Archive and Vault services. Its StorNext offerings enable customers to manage large unstructured data sets in an information workflow.

Receive News & Ratings for Quantum Corporation Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Quantum Corporation and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Leave a Reply