Reviewing Ferrovial (NASDAQ:FER) and Sino Land (OTCMKTS:SNLAY)

Ferrovial (NASDAQ:FER) and Sino Land (OTCMKTS:SNLAY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrovial and Sino Land’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferrovial	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sino Land	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Ferrovial and Sino Land, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferrovial	0	5	3	0	2.38
Sino Land	0	0	1	0	3.00

Ferrovial presently has a consensus price target of $73.12, indicating a potential upside of 8.35%. Given Ferrovial’s higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Ferrovial is more favorable than Sino Land.

Risk & Volatility

Ferrovial has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sino Land has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

22.3% of Ferrovial shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Ferrovial pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sino Land pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferrovial and Sino Land”s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferrovial	$10.89 billion	4.55	$1.00 billion	N/A	N/A
Sino Land	$1.05 billion	14.60	$516.04 million	N/A	N/A

Ferrovial has higher revenue and earnings than Sino Land.

Summary

Ferrovial beats Sino Land on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Ferrovial

Ferrovial SE, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the design, construction, financing, operation, and maintenance of transport infrastructure and urban services internationally. It operates through four segments: Construction, Toll Roads, Airports, and Energy Infrastructures and Mobility. The company designs and executes various public and private works, including the construction of public infrastructure; and develops, finances, and operates toll roads. It also develops, finances, and operates airports; and develops, finances, and operates power transmission lines and renewable energy generation plants, as well as offers mobility and waste management plants and services to the mining industry in Chile. In addition, the company promotes, constructs, and operates energy generation and transmission infrastructures. The company was founded in 1952 and is based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

About Sino Land

Sino Land Company Limited, an investment holding company, invests in, develops, manages, and trades in properties. It operates through six segments: Property Sales, Property Rental, Property Management and Other Services, Hotel Operations, Investments in Securities, and Financing. The company's property portfolio includes shopping malls, offices, industrial buildings, residentials and car parks. In addition, it provides cleaning, building construction and management, financing, administration, security, mortgage loan financing, secretarial, management, project management, securities investment, consultancy, and deposit placing services, as well as operates hotels. Further, the company engages in real estate agency and trustee related services. The company operates approximately 19.5 million square feet of attributable floor area in Mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Sydney. Sino Land Company Limited was incorporated in 1971 and is based in Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong. The company is a subsidiary of Tsim Sha Tsui Properties Limited.